This topic is for reporting about pictures with missed location or invalid geo object assigned. Please share:
1. Link to the picture or geo object.
2. Suggestion for editing.
You can change or add any geo object in the Geonames database, please read FAQ here: http://trainspo.com/ftopic/29/
@joaosilva Yes, we have it database but with different name: http://trainspo.com/geo/2734559/
The Pictures, wich are located at Lintorf have a wrong location. The Authors ment Ratingen-Lintorf in Northrhine Westfalia, but located are they in Lintorf near Bad Essen, wich is in a complete other area of germany: http://trainspo.com/geo/2876959/gallery/
And the Picture of the green V200 isn't made in Ratingen Lintorf, it is made in Duisburg Entenfang. So may it could be corrected?
Can you please suggest link of geo object that have pictures in wrong location and link to geo object where pictures should be moved. Just to be sure
@ter I'm not sure if i understand you right, but i try:
Lintorf over here is wrong: http://trainspo.com/map/#12/52.3288/8.4602
the pictures wich are postet with this location should be located here: http://trainspo.com/map/#14/51.3355/6.8359
@Kursbuchstrecke ok, thanks! Hope now it's correct.
These two images have wrong location data: https://trainspo.com/photo/20496/ https://trainspo.com/photo/20495/
Actual location is Komsomolsk-on-Amur.
Have now amended both to the location that you have given.
I wonder why geolocation for this picture https://trainspo.com/photo/29053/
is not fixed after two reports? I understand that having two obvious pictures of the same vehicle the same day and location drops a shadow on the work of users having picture approvement rights, but it seems to me that having correct data is more important?
Correct location is Raz"yezd Kipyatovka, a place that is easily recognized. It's quite far away from the current location of the picture.